Pic credit: STV/Stewart Attwood

Mental health callouts a ‘systemic crisis’

The equivalent of almost 500 full-time officers is needed to deal with the volume of mental health-related incidents

Mental health callouts a ‘systemic crisis’

The equivalent of almost 500 full-time officers is needed to deal with the volume of mental health-related incidents

Pic credit: STV/Stewart Attwood

The volume of mental health-related incidents being attended by police in Scotland is a “systemic crisis” which is preventing officers from doing their jobs, MSPs have heard.

Almost one in five calls to Police Scotland is related to a mental health concern, with such cases requiring the equivalent of almost 500 full-time officers to deal with.

The stark figures emerged as both the First Minister and the Justice Secretary acknowledged that cops are spending too much time in A&E rather than on the front line.

John Swinney said the issue had been raised with him by police both “locally and nationally”, while Neil Gray admitted there was “more to do” to address the problem.

The latest figures on mental health related deployments were set out by Police Scotland in a written submission to Holyrood’s Criminal Justice Committee.

It revealed that during 2025/26, the force received 234,952 mental health-related calls, around 18 per cent of the total.

This resulted in 173,377 deployments, taking up 775,326 policing hours, with the average time taken to deal with a mental health-related incident put at 5.3 hours.

The force calculated that this is equivalent to 481 officers being dedicated to such incidents on a full-time basis each year, at a cost of more than £34 million.

In its submission to MSPs, it warned that the role of policing has “grown beyond… what is financially and operationally sustainable”.

It added that measures put in place to address the issue have had only “a modest impact on a systemic crisis which continues to call for a step change in our collective response”.

It continued: “Police Scotland continues to have a role in addressing vulnerability, whether associated with criminality or where there is an immediate threat to life or risk of serious harm, or involvement of a person under 18.

“Policing’s role has grown beyond what is best for vulnerable people, what is intended in legislation, and what is financially and operationally sustainable”

Police Scotland submission to MSPs

“However, in the absence of other factors… mental ill health or distress is not a policing matter.

“In such cases police attendance is an inappropriate response, and risks stigmatising or criminalising those who need other professional care, and diverts police staff from responding to matters uniquely requiring the skills and expertise of policing.”

The comments echo a warning issued by Chief Constable Jo Farrell earlier this year, when she said the current situation “cannot continue”.

David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), said the situation was “deeply concerning”.

He told 1919: “These figures demonstrate the extent to which police officers are being relied upon to fill gaps in mental health and wider public services.

“Police officers do an incredibly challenging job and will always respond when someone is in crisis. However, they are not mental health professionals, and policing cannot be the default response to a systemic crisis.

“This level of demand places additional pressure on an already stretched service, impacts officer wellbeing, and reduces the resources available to respond to other emergencies.

“A step change is required, with proper investment in mental health services and a genuinely effective, multi-agency response. We need the right care for the right person. 

“The current position is not sustainable for officers, the police service, or the people who need specialist support.”

In an interview with 1919 after becoming Justice Secretary, Gray promised to cut the time wasted by police officers in A&E departments through earlier health interventions.

Asked about the issue again in October, he told MSPs that “the current situation is not what we want it to be”.

He added: “We are talking about uniformed officers responding to people in distress. That is not what the individuals affected want, and it is not the correct use of police officers’ time.

“For certain calls, there will always be a need for officers to be present… however [it] is right to say that officers are being called to attend too many such incidents and are being detained in accident and emergency for too long.

“In recent years, the situation has improved – 76,000 hours of police officer time has been saved as a result of work that has been done by Police Scotland and the health service. However, there is more to do.

“Capacity needs to be improved, and new support needs to be made available through the health service.”

The issue also came up during a recent session of First Minister’s Questions, with Swinney saying: “I often hear from police officers, locally and nationally, about the volume of engagement that police officers have with members of the public in mental health distress.”

As well as existing interventions, there are also plans for a national rollout of mental health triage cars, which currently operate in Glasgow, Inverness and Dundee.

Relief after the chaos

By Magnus Gardham 
Former Scotland Office special adviser

Got there in the end. That, at least, was the snap verdict of the Chancellor’s backbench colleagues, who waved their order papers wildly at the end of her 65-minute budget speech.

They have endured a miserable few weeks as downbeat briefings, followed by clumsy un-briefings, sparked fears of a political disaster for Labour and dented confidence in the government.

And the drama didn’t end on budget day, with claims that Rachel Reeves misled the public followed by this month’s resignation of the chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

“The most chaotic lead up to a budget in living memory,” taunted Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch in the Commons as she highlighted the pre-budget blunder that led to this resignation – the early publication of the OBR assessment.

When the spending plans were finally announced – as we knew to expect – Reeves avoided the poisonous step of increasing the basic rate of income tax in clear breach of Labour’s manifesto.

Instead, she revealed a plethora of smaller taxes that Labour can argue will hit those who can afford to pay more. And, of course, a freezing of thresholds until 2031 which will bring more people into tax and into higher rates.

Those rates do not apply in Scotland where income tax thresholds are devolved to Holyrood.

“The Chancellor handed Scottish Labour another get-out-of-jail card”

But the Chancellor’s move goes a long way to explaining the genuinely positive reaction from Labour MSPs. They had faced the unhappy prospect of explaining complex intergovernmental fiscal rules – and why they would cost the Scottish Government £1 billion – had Reeves raised the basic rate by 2p.

With the Holyrood election looming ever larger, the Chancellor handed Scottish Labour another get-out-of-jail card.

The two-child benefit cap was popular with the public, but appalled Labour.

By axeing it, in what was easily the most heartfelt section of her speech, Reeves delighted her own side but also removed a potentially devastating dividing line between Labour and the SNP.

SNP ministers were committed to mitigating the impact of the cap, starting just weeks before the election, and were preparing to hammer Labour – sorry, make that “callous Labour” – for the £155 million it would have cost them next year.

The Scottish Government will now save that cash and have an extra £820 million to spend, to the end of the spending review period in 2028, through the Barnett formula.

Reeves tried to credit Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar with the windfall. “Because he asked us to,” she told the Commons.

That is not really how the Barnett formula works and the sum, reflecting UK spending, was a lot less than last year’s bumper £3.4 billion transfer.

It will not stop SNP claims of austerity in the run up to next May but then, nothing would.