Photo by Greg Macvean

Police watchdog raises vetting concerns

In the wake of high-profile cases, HMICS has written to the Chief Constable

By Gemma Fraser
Head of content

Police watchdog raises vetting concerns

In the wake of high-profile cases, HMICS has written to the Chief Constable

Photo by Greg Macvean

Scotland’s police watchdog has written to the Chief Constable to seek assurances over vetting in the wake of recent high-profile cases of officers being exposed as violent sex offenders.

His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) raised concerns about the time it is taking Police Scotland to carry out recommendations made three years ago to ensure, at the very least, officers and staff hold recruitment vetting.

The recommendations came in an HMICS report in October 2023 which highlighted that prior to the creation of Police Scotland, vetting was varied, inconsistent, and not always recorded effectively.

It revealed that no checks of officers and staff employed by the legacy forces were carried out when the new organisation was established in 2013, with some having no vetting record.

The watchdog’s latest concerns come after the disturbing details of crimes committed by two former Police Scotland officers emerged.

Earlier this year, police officer Alan Greer was revealed to be a violent rapist. He took his own life in May while under investigation for a string of violent sex attacks over a 14-year period.

In September, Campbell Petrie was found guilty of nine charges, including two of rape, as well as indecent assault, assault with intent to rape and assault to injury and danger of life, which took place between 2006 and 2023.

He was a serving officer at the time of the offences, and was arrested, charged and suspended from duty in December 2023. He retired from Police Scotland in December 2025.

HMICS lead inspector Maggie Pettigrew told the Scottish Police Authority’s complaints and conduct committee that the watchdog is “concerned” about the time taken to progress recommendation two from its report – to undertake an urgent review to ensure that all officers and staff have been subject to at least recruitment vetting.

“Following the recent press reporting, HMI Mr Naylor has written to Police Scotland asking for assurances”
HMICS lead inspector Maggie Pettigrew

She said: “We don’t underestimate the size of the piece of work that’s required to discharge it, but we did publish our report in October 2023 and the current update states that they indicate with a very high surety that all police officers and staff hold recruitment vetting… but we will require some evidence as to how that level of confidence has been reached.”

Members of the committee heard that a “historic data wash” had been carried out and all paper copy vetting from the legacy forces had been converted to the digital Core-Vet case management system.

Pettigrew added: “Following the recent press reporting, [HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary Craig] Naylor (main picture) has written to Police Scotland asking for assurances about how robust that historic data wash has been, and what confidence it has over the action taken in relation to any responses that the data wash might have generated.”

David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, told 1919 that while he accepts the importance of vetting and the work being done to implement the HMICS recommendations, it has its limitations when it comes to identifying potential sex offenders.

It recently came to light that Greer had passed vetting checks to join the police, despite having two reports of criminal behaviour against women on his record.

“These cases… do shake public trust and confidence in policing, not least in relation to violence against women and girls. This is and must be a matter of the highest concern”

Chris Creegan, Scottish Police Authority vice chair

He was investigated by police in 2002 and 2005 for making inappropriate phone calls to women, with one case resulting in a formal police caution. However, he was accepted into Strathclyde Police in 2009, despite the force being aware of his previous offending.

“I don’t believe vetting is going to stop narcissistic men within the police service, and it’s not going to stop people who are going to commit crimes against women,” said Kennedy.

“The only way we stop that is by having a system whereby people aren’t scared of reporting a police officer for committing a crime. That’s what we need to fix.”

Chair of the complaints and conduct committee and SPA vice chair, Chris Creegan, also voiced concerns on the issue at a subsequent meeting of the full SPA board.

“As the Chief Constable and her colleagues know only too well, these cases, while different in certain important respects and of course small in number, do shake public trust and confidence in policing, not least in relation to violence against women and girls. This is and must be a matter of the highest concern for us all,” he said.

A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “The safeguarding of our values and standards is extremely important to the organisation, and we are committed to ongoing learning and improvement in relation to our vetting approach.

“We have implemented changes to policy and procedures as a result of the enactment of the Police (Ethics, Conduct and Scrutiny) (Scotland) Act 2025, and over recent years have twice increased the number of personnel in the vetting department.

“Recording of vetting before the creation of Police Scotland varied between the legacy forces. Although there were various recording methods prior to the current system, we know that all legacy police forces conducted vetting of officers and staff prior to their appointment.

“In addition to those holding recruitment vetting, there are more than 5,000 officers and staff who are vetted to an enhanced level which includes additional vetting reviews being carried out.

“The HMICS Assurance Review of Vetting 2023 recommendation in relation to the re-vetting process is also being progressed.

“In addition to the current recruitment vetting processes, additional checks for new recruits are conducted just prior to taking the oath of office.”

Staff union demands vetting safeguards

The union representing police staff has raised concerns over vetting safeguards for its members.

Unison Police Staff Scotland says staff need the same protections in law as officers under new regulations to implement 10-year renewal vetting.

It argues the process gives officers greater protections through a range of formal proceedings, but for staff who lose vetting clearance, the “only external route is an employment tribunal, after dismissal”.

David Malcolm, branch secretary, said: “Police staff are not arguing against vetting. Vetting is how the public knows who is working inside policing, and our members work to those standards every day.

“The problem is that the new law gives officers a statutory process with representation, disclosure and a right of appeal all the way to a tribunal, and gives staff a code of practice and an internal HR procedure.

“The consequence is identical. Lose your clearance and you lose your job. The protections are not [identical].

“The people most exposed to 10-year renewals are long-serving staff who were vetted decades ago and have never been re-vetted since, because Police Scotland never had a programme to do it. They are being measured against a standard that did not exist when they were appointed.

“The Scottish Government told parliament that the officer regulations guarantee transparency, fairness and proportionality at every stage.

“That is the standard ministers think a career-ending decision in policing deserves. We want the same decision, with the same consequences, to attract the same safeguards, whoever it is taken against.”

SPPA boss to face MSPs again over pensions crisis

By Gemma Fraser 
Former Edinburgh Evening News reporter

The boss of the SPPA is expected to reappear in front of a powerful Holyrood committee this month.

Dr Stephen Pathirana, the chief executive, gave evidence to MSPs in December. At the time, he offered to come back with a further account to the finance and public administration committee.

In the interim, Audit Scotland – the country’s public services watchdog – published a critical report saying the SPPA should be more transparent.

And in a letter from committee convener Kenneth Gibson to Dr Pathirana, seen by 1919, further clarity was requested.

He wrote: “The committee remains to be convinced that these matters are being treated with the sense of urgency that the matter deserves.

“We are also uncertain if the SPPA is prioritising retirees and those at the end of their working lives, or instead focusing on increasing the overall number of cases addressed.”

The MSPs will also seek “details of how the organisation is benchmarking its performance in relation to the delivery of the remedy against other public companies and private companies”.

The appearance is expected on Tuesday, March 10.

“The Chancellor handed Scottish Labour another get-out-of-jail card”

Sign up to receive 1919 in your inbox

We hope you are enjoying this edition of 1919. Sign up here to get next month’s issue sent direct to your inbox.

By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.